Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin make a strong claim "Transformation" to fellow Sarawak voters that confronted PKR slogan "change".
I don't know which is a better word, or more suitable for fellow Malaysians. So I took a bit of time to analyse both claim, let's begin with "transformation". It means you are in one state, changing into another one, with progression involved. When a caterpillar turns into a butterfly, that's transformation. it is based on a solid foundation, but I doubt how its gonna be applied into government's situation, what are they transforming from? and transform into? There's no clear statement being made, but only tax payers' funded giveaway flying around.
Then we have "change", change basically means things are fucked up in the past, so a whole new direction is needed, and most probably a new leader. If you study corporation around the world, when things get fucked up, the CEO will be fired. They won't keep the same old CEO waiting for him to evolved into something better or so, just as trump says "its hard for people to change."
This doesn't says the fired-CEO is useless, it just an hint that he is no longer suitable to lead the corporation he is being fired from.
Dear brother and sister in Sarawak, You guys have the richest natural resources in the country, have you ever thought why you are where you are today?
Its time to think and elaborate hard, under which party the nature wealth would be returned to you.
You can call me bias, but from the fact that Malaysian in Penang are having better life under PKR's leadership, and the case where the arrest of Leng Liong Sik who claimed he is fighting for the chinese community during his times as the chariman for more than a decade, I will go for change.
By the way, when someone claimed they will rescue you from poverty, why not ask "who puts you into poverty in the first place?"
No comments:
Post a Comment